Do different

The well-known Apple slogan Think different attracts a lot of people. People like to feel unique, just see the global market size of fashion industry, where people pay mainly for uniqueness. But do we really think, and more importantly, do different? In my opinion, the current social structures and technological order discourage people from doing unusual things that are different from the mainstream. And it seems to me that this loss of creativity and energy is the most important problem of our century, and not some kind of climate change or increasing social inequality in society. What are the reasons for this social reduction in desire do something different?

Zero level (biological-evolutionary). People are social creatures, so their position in society is very important to them ("recognition as the driving force behind human behavior" (c) Tyler Cowen). However, humans, with a planning intelligence that sets them apart from all other animals, are free to choose. With freedom comes risk and uncertainty: humans don't know in advance what to choose, so they look to others for cues. René Girard called this effect mimetic desire (we desire what others desire because we imitate their desires) and defined imitation as the fundamental mechanism of human behavior. This explains the biological basis for people to imitate each other in their aspirations and, consequently, the absence of prerequisites for a large differentiation of activities within a particular society.

The first level (psychological-cultural). Crazy ideas are always perceived with caution by society. But in some societies, social structures allow some of these ideas to flourish, while in others they do not. As Ben Landau-Taylor points out "tolerant [to economic disruptions] institutions and culture have been a necessary component of industrial supremacy since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution". There are now fewer and fewer societies with such social structures that support crazy ideas. In addition, we have forgotten how to make commitments, without which it is impossible to push any crazy idea to a positive ending (Elon spent at least 15 years to make his electric cars gain great popularity).

The second level (economic and political). I see careerism flourishing, especially among talented people - people are increasingly embraced by the desire for more options instead of pursuing risky and more creative career avenues. Perhaps this is due to the successful strategy of attracting new employees by Wall Street / management consulting / tech corporations or increased complexity of tasks, due to which more mature people get the most interesting tasks, but the trend is clear - today's most prestigious career tracks lead to misallocation people's creativity.

Because of so many of the above reasons, the question may arise - how then can crazy things be created at all? In general, this is possible: 1) biologically we have a sense of curiosity - an attraction to something new, which, after overcoming some resistance, attracts people and quickly becomes a new norm like environmentalism; 2) society somehow reproduces individuals who are capable of crazy innovations - often these people turn out to be anti-social, for example, with Aspenger's syndrome; 3) in addition, these people often unite in clusters, creating their own mini-culture, in which such ideas are born and nurtured; 4) the instituons of some countries such as the US are still capable of supporting unique and crazy ideas.

But in such circumstances, the flowering of crazy ideas seems to be the exception rather than the rule. Can we somehow redirect the incentives in the capitalist system towards creating something more creative and unique? For example:

  1. In terms of culture - to develop new thinking, promote a culture of progress and encourage doing something else, for example through parades in support of bright projects / personalities or creating new "futuristic" media like Palladium
  2. In terms of research - to study the phenomenon of imitation and risk-aversion among people (what factors affect this, does the degree of risk-phobia change over the course of life, and if so, how and why?)
  3. In terms of decision-making mechanisms - to change the mechanisms for distributing support in the form of grants/fellowships/loans to more radical ones like New Science does
  4. In terms of career building, it is possible to 1) make pursuing unique things prestigious through new type of accelerators a-la EV or YC (at that time) or TF or Pioneer or FTX Future Fund (oops) => create new accelerators or funds to support unique ideas and projects; 2) disrupt HR processes, offer working alternatives to current resume signaling models; 3) uplift outsiders, people from low social classes or immigrants, as they are less subject to prestige and usually have a fresher, third-party look at things familiar to many people; 4) personally inspire people to higher aspirations and ambitions
  5. In terms of education, it is worth to be more courageous to shape the thinking of people who are educated at educational institutions, encourage them to achieve greatness and not be afraid of such one-sided pressure on students, this is the meaning of the institution, which should be wider than specific individuals; also we can better focus on the specific interests of students and develop them, instead of leveling all areas and insustries in the MBA style
  6. Something else? Glad to hear and add to this list of suggestions any other ideas!